🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding System & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach only to fire them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then bin them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.